Any topic (Writer’s choice)

Outline and discuss the argument presented in one of the following three newspaper articles then, drawing on the suggested reading and your own research, explain why you agree or disagree with the analysis presented.

There has been a total failure on the part of China to control the excesses that are in its credit system. Therefore, China is facing increasing risks of a full-blown banking crisis as implies by the early warning indicators (Naughton, 2014, p. 20). The conditions are right for the problem in China because it has faced credit boom since the last financial crisis, the credit boom is really unprecedented in world history (Evans-Pritchard, 2016). The Chinese banks are sitting on over 28 trillion dollars of outstanding and non-performing loans. Such a huge sum of money is equal to the Japan’s and U.S. commercial banking systems combined. The Chinese primary measure or gauge of credit vulnerability is currently thrice more than the danger threshold. It has additionally continued to get worse regardless of the pledges by Li Keqiang, the Chinese premier, to wean its economy off growth that is driven by debts as early as possible. According to the bank of International Settlements, the credit to GDP gap of China is currently at 30.1, which is the highest level ever achieved to date. The credit to GDP gap is considerably greater than the scores in the US subprime bubble prior to the Lehman crisis or in the speculative boom of the East Asia on 1997.  This is an indication that China is currently sinking deeper into debt and therefore, is risking a major banking crisis (Bo et al. 2014, p. 1).

Currently, the corporate debt in China is 171% of the GDP despite the government debt being under control; therefore it is just a short time before the country’s debt bubble terribly bursts. According to the studies of prior banking crises around the globe in the course of last sixty years, any score that is above ten requires watchful monitoring. Because the credit to GDP gap determines deviations from ordinary patterns inside any given country and consequently strips out social contrasts, a higher value implies a huge deviation which suggests a huge banking risk. China has an extremely high level of credit, 255 percent of GDP as per the end of last year, for any developing economy and it has indications of further increase at a faster rate. China has higher outstanding loans which are equivalent to the commercial banking systems of Japan and US combined. This higher scale is sufficient to threaten a global shock should China ever lose control. In addition, the higher corporate level keeps the global regulators awake at night as it poses worries regarding the health of the financial system of the world (Kowalski & Shachmurove, 2011, p. 56). For instance, bond purchases and Zero loan costs by central banks have left the financial markets intensely responsive to the smallest shift in money related arrangement, or even an indication of a shift. The bond yields are used in tracking the rate of growth of normal GDP in the major economies; however, they are currently far lower than expected. For instance, around 10 trillion dollars are trading at negative rates; this strengthens richly-valued stock markets (Evans-Pritchard, 2016). However, the main inherent risk is that a violent increase in the bond yields in case the pattern reverts to the norm would set off a flight from the worldwide bourses. Therefore, one alarming advancement is a breakdown in the connection between rates of interest and currencies in the worldwide markets because the condition portrays as an infringement of the iron law of “covered interest rate parity.” The main worry is that banks are showing an exceptionally defensive reflex, and has the possibility of pulling back unexpectedly as evidenced amid the Lehman crisis once they anticipate fear. This implies that rather than being a shock absorber, the banking sector may turn into shock amplifier (Hardy et al (2008, p. 120).

A full-blown banking crisis is inevitable in China because it is emerging as the epicenter of risk. It has alarming levels of debt which cannot be effectively addressed within the shortest time possible. The debts have been growing so fast that they threaten to swallow up China in a methodical financial crisis. It is the time china accepted that economic growth cannot be forced by levering up. Therefore, the country needs to take its punishment and begin repaying its foreign debts that are denominated in dollars (Bo et al. 2014, p. 10).

The main problem facing china is internal credit, and the risk they face is that a crisp spate of capital surges will compel its central bank to offer the foreign exchange reserves to guard the Yuan, an action that automatically tightens its monetary policy. This action could encourage an endless loop as credit troubles start out additional capital outflows in extremis (Wagner, 2010, p. 65. Being the arm of the Chinese Communist party, the Chinese banking system will perpetually roll-over the debts in case of any denouement thereby sapping the essentialness of the economy progressively (Evans-Pritchard, 2016). Unlike in the 1990s when the country weathered a banking crisis because it was in the boom period of catch-up industrialization and was getting a demographic dividend, the circumstances are currently different as it is no longer hyper-aggressive. In addition, it has a shrinking workforce as well as a vastly greater time scale.

I agree with the analysis presented because of the following reasons. Firstly, there should be significant pervasive institutional or macroeconomic weaknesses for a full-blown banking crisis. China has an extremely high level of corporate and financial debts. The level of debt in the Chinese economy is on a path that cannot be sustained and therefore there is the likelihood extremely serious repercussions should China experience financial problem (Krugman, 2010, p. 44). The level of money related and corporate obligation and the multifaceted nature of the monetary framework and quick development in shadow banking is on an unsustainable path. The current level of debt is still reasonable in its size given the extent of the public resources under the control of the public; however, the trend is unsafe. The more it endures, the more genuine the unsettling influence and the disturbance may be. For instance, it could pose a reaction range of mild growth slowdown to a sharp growth slowdown to conceivably financial crisis. Chinese economic crisis would pose serious implications or repercussions for the rest of the world, both real and financial because it has huge foreign debts which are equal to the Japan’s and U.S. commercial banking systems combined. In addition, China has increasing financial links with the rest of the world economy. Therefore, there is a considerable increase in the China’s spillovers to global financial markets in the next few years (Golin, 2010, p. 35).

On the other hand, there are different economic circumstances and China may not escape the financial crisis as it did during the 2008 global financial crisis. China got away from the most noticeably bad of the 2008 worldwide financial crisis by beginning a campaign of state-coordinated spending that made heaps of new obligation. This padded the blow of the aftermath around the globe. In any case, critics contend such an action only postponed China’s own particular moment of retribution (Cai & Chan, 2009, p. 513). China still continues to add credit at a higher pace, and specialists are beginning to sound alerts because under this circumstance, it is risking its own particular rendition of the global financial crisis of 2008 that shook Wall Street and drove the US into recession followed by many years of horrendously slow growth (Grigor & Salikhov, 2009, p. 40).

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
SKYSAVE