Ten Years After 9/11, We’re Still In The Dark

“Ten Years After 9/11, We’re Still in the Dark” is an article that was written by Omar Ashmawy and published in the Washington Post on September 9, 2010. It opposes the drastic measures that America too in attempting to defend itself against terror attacks. The article is about a full description of some of the author’s personal experiences as a member of the United States Military. It also explains the conclusions that the author came to during his time in the military (Ashmawy, 702).

A good number of laws and regulations are established the US to help in fighting against the threat of Islamic extremism. Also, several men and women of the military have put their undivided attention and commitment towards the same. However, the war is far from over. After so many years of commitment as well as so much sacrifice, nothing has changed. The war on terror is not easy to win because Islam or Arab culture is not well understood by the Western countries. This implies that the United States as well as other world superpowers are not able to precisely predict their relationship with Arab and Muslim countries and, therefore, cannot easily identify the real enemies from the mass (Ashmawy, 702).

The main argument for his cause is found in the second paragraph where he states, “We don’t understand Islam or Arab culture, and that ignorance prevents us from accurately predicting our relationship with Arab and Muslim countries and identifying our enemies” (Ashmawy, 702). Unless the US, as well as other nations, identifies the real drive for the Islamic extremism, they will not be able to contain the situation. The US is not able to accurately identify the real or official enemy because they easily blend in the common population. However, the US needs to forge a mutual relationship with the common Muslims to help them in identifying the real threats. This will prevent them from generalizing thus being able to tell the sympathizer from the opportunist or the devout from the radical so that they can be able to fight the real enemy.

This article has extraordinary validity because of the individual experiences that the writer gives. He frequently utilizes this as a device to persuade the reader of reality or truth in what he is stating. Omar Ashmawy does this by utilizing expressions, for example, “I saw it firsthand” (Ashmawy, 703). Despite all the preparations, he states that “We are caught off guard by events we should have anticipated.” This is because American soldiers, agents, as well as analysts, lack the facts that they need in making informed decisions regarding the individuals to trust, what to believe, as well as how to effectively control the threat. Although the FBI may recommend that its agents, in a bid to understand Islam or Arab culture, to read books written by well-known anti-Muslim authors, the almost lack of cultural and linguistic training in the military and misplaced anxiety over the Sharia laws reverberates through the policies of the US (Ashmawy, 703).

Even though Ashmawy’s organization is loaded with power and authority it lacks a single statistic and therefore, it is difficult to figure out if the article gives an all the more persuading contention as it contained viewpoints that I believed, and others I didn’t. In the article, the author states that “From our government to the front lines, individuals are making decisions based on inaccurate, biased information” (Ashmawy, 702). However, it fails to provide the proof. There are no details or quotes about the fact that the White House’s August announcement on combating radical Islam actually acknowledged that reality. Also, the article does not present arguments effectively. For instance, the author repeats an argument by stating again that “we don’t understand the differences between Islamic extremism and Islam or that Arab culture is not the same as religion” (Ashmawy, 703).

The article fails to effectively explain terms such as Arab Spring, and this implies that we are not poised to understand fully Islam and Arab culture. It is quite astonishing that American still struggle to understand such basics. However, the author attempts to reveal the evils and injustices that the government commits. He states that “It filled Guantanamo Bay with men who did not need to be there and barred their release” (Ashmawy, 703). Inability to fully understand basics negatively affects intelligence-gathering on the part of the legal process which permits the worst to happen.

All in all, “Ten Years After 9/11, We’re Still in the Dark” did not completely convince me as a reader. “Ten Years After 9/11, We’re Still in the Dark” would have been substantially more compelling in case it had a more grounded appeal to rationale or logic. It needed to give or offer more facts applicable to the conclusion as well as provide more consideration to other opinions. The absence of doing as such brought on the exposition to appear somewhat one-sided or biased. However, the article engaged feeling extremely well and ought to be complimented for the solid connection it could make with the audience.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
SKYSAVE