Political science

Part-Time Versus Full-Time Legislators

The main objective for any legislature is to provide the government and its other arms with policies and legislations to work on and operate. This, therefore, means that the quality of the legislature is not so much their professionalization or compensation but rather the facilitation, independence, and operationalization. However, although this may seem to indicate that whichever the system, the end justifies the means, a full-time legislature seems more favorable in most situations.

First, the independence of the legislature is one of the measures of the quality of their operations. This independence is always affected by the increased interaction with the rest of the population as well as the economic vulnerability. With a part-time legislature that is poorly paid, there is a likelihood of compromise since the legislators have no job tenure and also lack the monetary incentive to cushion from external influence. This kind of influence is better prevented with legislators who are assured of their jobs, professionalized and well compensated.

Some proponents of the part-time legislature argue that it is quite expensive for some states to compensate for the legislators. However, most of the states in America are wealthy enough to handle a fairly well-paid legislature that is full-time. This would ensure that the nature and quality of the legislations are not compromised by external influences. My stand, therefore, is that to ensure quality and effectiveness of the legislature, it would be better for all states to adopt the full-time legislature system or a hybrid of both the full-time and part-time.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :