Intergovenmental Relations


The recent immigration ban put in place by trump attracted mixed reactions across the states, private and public organizations. Implementation of the executive power was initially challenged by a judge and up to date faces criticism in various quarters of American society. This ban is a typical project that require collaboration between federal government and states. The increasing democratic space means that intergovernmental management must change in its structure and functionality. The deviation from traditional central power to a participatory network is the best way to handle such projects (Jack and Kurt,2012). It is worth to note that existing political structures constitute a complex pattern of checks and balances that cut on the implementation of executive orders. Besides, emerging socio-political dynamism compel the federal government to embrace collaboration rather than controlling.

Intergovernmental management is an important concept in the modern social and political relations. The longstanding battle between the federal government and the states is blamed for development bottlenecks. In fact, the federal government has always exercised more of controlling and directive role leaving the states with limited decision-making role. While most of the federal policies target implementation from states level, the emerging social dynamics necessitate redesign of intergovernmental management. Essence, Agranoff emphasizes the need for organizations to change culture and endorse networking rather than control when it comes to intergovernmental management. The influence of collaboration is undeniably the feasible approach towards constructive projects implementation in the interest of members of the public (Jack and Kurt, 2012). The idea of Agranoff is that the intergovernmental relations should shift from unilateral source of directive to a consensual approach. In the instance of the immigration Agenda in the US, federal government has no option but to build a strong case that will reconcile diverse groups of interests and individual state governments. It is imperative that divergent views are put together to ensure the final resolution is objective instead of subjective. A critical review of Agranoff’s position is relevant to the contemporary needs of intergovernmental relations. To address the Immigration law, the government need to organize its policy making structure to maximize its connection with senate, among other intergovernmental agencies. The federal government must acknowledge the reality of interdependence and collaboration for the law to effectively work (Jack and Kurt, 2012). The interjurisdiction politics that vest some powers to individual states, offer judges authority to overturn some executive orders. In that respect, the Whitehouse must court various stakeholders to establish the viability of such immigration policies. Besides, it is imperative that the federal government consider the interest of the citizens and act with an outcome prospect that outweigh discontent among the people. It is critical to explore capacity building and institute participatory debating that will provide the direction of each direction. It is worth to note that intergovernmental relations must emphasize policy reforms that conform to the emerging trends, globalization and expansive democratic space. Agranoff’s viewpoint on this subject is therefore proactive, reliable, valid, and relevant to the contemporary society.

Response to posts

Response to April Williams

April Williams provide an insight into the underlying concept of intergovernmental management in projects implementation. Considering the multiple parties involved in such public projects such as rise in sea level, collaborative approach is critical. The author is emphatic on the need to adopt Agranoff’s eight conditions which is consistent with the project identified. In that regard, the post is creative, critical, and informative in as far as intergovernmental relations is concerned. Giving a case of sea rise as a project, the author emphasizes the need for unity of purpose to boost implementation process. Engaging the citizens is in the spirit of the constitution and enhances democracy. It is therefore a great idea to emphasize networking and working towards a common goal. Soliciting of public opinion to reinforce intergovernmental contributions are a recipe to constructive and objective decision outcome. As such, the projects are likely to be implemented effectively.  April therefore reaffirms the viability of Agnoff’s intergovernmental relations in realizing achievement of set goals.

Response on Lorenzo

Lorenzo gives an example of the latest project that provoke international conflict and causes internal discomfort. The US-Mexican border is a contentious issue that has been characterized by uncertainties. In essence, the Mexican government, the US federal government and governors of the affected area are all embroiled is a technical political appeal. Mexican American employers have the share of their discomfort. The communal involvement of the people exhibit spirit of inclusivity and rule of the majority. The author is emphatic on the need for multi-dimensional collaboration, networking, and interdependence to effect implementation. In that regard, the author reaffirms the need for intergovernmental relations that focuses on all people. The post is valid, reliable, and relevant to the topic under discussion. The necessitate of private and public sector collaboration will be the most viable means to achieve set project goals, including setting up task force, and advisory commissions.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :