GUN CONTROL

Gun control debate in the US

Gun control debate has been raging on for years in the US amid increasing deaths caused by individual firearm owners carrying out Mass shooting. The political stalemates that surround the topic continue to attract public attention and entrench opinion differences between proponents and opponents. The latest  Roseburg shooting in a College, Oregon provoked even President Obama to reiterate campaign in favor of strict Gun control measures. It is, therefore, important to pursue further research on this contentious political agenda.

Annotated bibliography

Carter, G. L. (2006). Gun control in the United States: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO.

Carter offers an insight into the Sides taken by people on this subject. The conflict is reflected in the political divide with several Democrats championing for Gun control while Republicans are supporting firearm ownership. The author argues that Gun control is a matter of common interest as noted in presidential candidates’ debate touching on it, but the direction to go regarding implementation remains uncertain. The text has supportive data that makes the arguments relevant and valid in respect of the recent political debate on the issue. Criticism on the book points towards limited opinion differences and possible resolution. However, the work is useful in understanding the underlying concept of Gun control laws.

Meghan DeMaria.(2015). Martin O’Malley’s Gun Control Plan Compared To The Other Democrats Prove He’s A Candidate To Watch.BUSTLE. 7:53 PM – 3 Nov 2015

This article explores how the debate on Gun control in Maryland, USA, has elicited mixed reactions from members of the public and politicians. Meghan explains that the recent pledge by Democrat presidential candidate Martin O’Malley on strict gun control measures should he get in office explains the sensitivity of the issue. In the author’s opinion, the wake of the recent school shooting in the US, gun control has always been debated but politicians tactically avoid it due to its significance in election outcomes. The article is relevant to the contemporary social dynamism that characterizes the conduct of people in possession of firearms. The article is criticized for limited statistical data to support its claims but explore the extent of sensitivity of the issue.

Wilson, H. L. (2007). Guns, gun control, and elections: The politics and policy of firearms. Lanham, Md. [u.a.: Rowman & Littlefield.

Wilson explores the evident division in respect of Gun control laws continues to attract political debate with an emphasis on safety. In the author’s opinion, although laws are in place, the feasibility of their implication remains the bone of contention. Key aspects of the law surround effective F.B.I background check on potential firearm owners and the controversial 2005 act on manufacturer immunity. The arguments advanced in this book are supported by a collection of other scholars’ research validating its relevance to the topic.

Doherty, B. (2008). Gun control on trial: Inside the Supreme Court battle over the Second Amendment. Washington, D.C: Cato Institute.

Doherty notes that those against gun control hold on the second amendment that despite several court battles, the clear ruling has not been given. On the other hand, the gun control campaigners associate the upsurge in the mass shooting to flaws in the law. This book explores the centrality of Supreme Court when it comes to the practicality of Gun control law reforms. The text is relevant and reliable regarding its in-depth research supported by literature review from other scholars.

 

 

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
SKYSAVE