Debate on Euthanasia

The debate on Euthanasia has been raging and dominates the global media. The sensitivity of the topic has elicited controversy with proponents and opponents arguing out their positions. From personal opinion, assisted suicide needs critical and creative thinking in as far as its legalization is concerned. Participatory decision making that emphasize public opinion should inform its legalization. Besides, political goodwill has been lacking with evident reluctance among key leaders in respect of social policies reforms. Review of past literature offers an insight into the core concepts, moral issues and political hurdles that surround the issue. In-depth comparison of scholarly works explores the information gap that seeks to bridge ideological differences on the matter. An annotated bibliography offers an avenue of intensive and extensive research on texts with the view of showing the logic behind either side of the arguments on assisted suicide. Emerging Death with Dignity act also surround the debate.

Reed Karaim.Should doctors be allowed to help terminally ill patient die?Assisted suicide.Published by CQ Press,an imprint of SAGE publications,Inc. Volume 23,number 19,pages 449-472

This journal is retrieved from online PCC database and discusses the controversy surrounding assisted suicide. The source of the journal and its peer review status authenticate its applicability in studying the progress of Euthanasia campaign. Reed explores the increasing outrage against Assisted suicide through testimony of would be victims. The article gives evidence to shun the socio-political debate pro-Euthanasia through individuals who had firsthand experience with similar situation. The author uses observed and secondary data from government records to explain the justification for stopping attempts towards passing Death with Dignity act.

In the article Oregon which was the first State to allow the practice is used to show the statistical trend on public feeling. The author emphasizes ethical concerns in as far as involuntary euthanasia is concerned. In fact, the article points out that cultural and religious fundamental significantly oppose the idea. In the interest of the victims, passing the law is likely to promote irresponsibility and contravene the fundamental human rights to life. The article blends evidence based nursing results with common observation on public opinion on media to assert the upsurge in opposition towards Euthanasia. The role of physician and the Hippocratic Oath on involuntary Euthanasia is also put under scrutiny. In essence the article is relevant as it is supported by well researched and verifiable facts. However, criticism can be directed towards its limited quantitative data and analysis. However, the article is generally reliable and valid in respect of the topic under discussion.

Suresh Bada Math and Santosh K. Chaturvedi. Euthanasia: Right to life vs right to die. Indian J Med Res. 2012 Dec; 136(6): 899–902

The authors of this work explore the pros and cons of Euthanasia. Various factors that negate the practice of Euthanasia are advanced in this article. Although the pros of assisted suicide are also explained, the author seems to offer a level ground for an informed decision on what side to take. It is worth to note that passive and active Euthanasia remains illegal in most countries. Possible elimination of terminally ill young people is pointed as a demerit of passing assisted suicide law. The academic level of the authors is a clear indication of widely researched work that covered all the aspects of the topic. Palliative care for the old, commercialization of healthcare services and sanctity of life are fronted as the critical variables that justify illegalization of assisted suicide. It is also worth to note that cultural structure of many communities does not embrace termination of life by another person. The author exhausts logical facts that explain the upwards trend in Euthanasia opposition. The article is relevant and is a derived from valid and reliable medical database hence useful in discussing the topic. However, the article is criticized for limited quantitative data to support the arguments of the authors.

 

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
SKYSAVE