Curtailing the Role of Iran in the Region by Supporting the Syria’s Moderate Opposition

Iran has increased its influence in the gulf region immensely in the recent past and this has been manifested greatly in its influence in Syria. Iran is among countries that are very ambitious to rule various regions of their choice. However, such desires rely on the ability of the country to initiate and maintain the activity. The initiative is directly dependent on the resources. Iran has identified a strategy that inclines towards religion and politics. Iran has ambitions to control the Gulf countries and some of Arab countries by supporting religious groups (Amirahmadi & Entessar, 2013). The country deems the strategy to be the best in this context. At the moment, Syria is facing serious civil conflicts that have also attracted noticeable international interest.

Indeed there is war and political instability in the region. The government has been opposed greatly – an event that has led to unrest in the country as the president and the government have exerted force and extortion to the opposition (Afary, 2015). In the political context, many states especially from the west have expressed their interest most of which have been attributed to the benefits that they think can come from their actions. In Syria, both government and opposition have maintained a strong stance on their ideologies and internalized them as well. In fact, the underlying fact is that if both can relent then they can tolerate one another and stability can be retained (Amirahmadi & Entessar, 2013). Concerning the president’s side, he has shown that he cannot relent on his options. The only option in this case would be for the opposition side to concede or remain mild and attain moderation.

Due to the current turmoil, there is little sense of sobriety among many agencies in Syria and Iran is taking advantage of the situation to achieve its interests. The United Arab Emirates within the GCC states has to work together and cooperate together by increasing the supporting to the Syria’s moderate opposition, in order to, curtail the role of Iran in the region. Helping in tackling the Syria’s problem requires that all countries in the region become stable and begin to speak out and take actions for oneself. The Gulf States attempt to steer Damascus away from Tehran to strengthen their regional standing which is central to their approach in Syria (Afary, 2015). This derives from their long-term interest in countering Iranian power in the region, exerted over recent years through the situation predominantly referred to as resistance axis which, by uniting Iran, Syria, Hezbollah, and Hamas, has played an important role in weakening Gulf regional influence (Paul, 2015). Gulf leaders believe that a new regime in Damascus ruling the country by Syrian moderate opposition will naturally ally itself with the Gulf States at the expense of Iran expense, particularly if they have helped establish the new order through financial and military support (Afary, 2015).
Currently, many countries especially the west has resorted to attacking Syria by launching devastating military attacks on the land. This approach has attributed to the belief among many states that Syria harbors the dreaded terrorist group ISIS/ ISIL (Amirahmadi & Entessar, 2013). In the real sense, the country has become a common enemy to the countries faced by serious threats of terrorism such as United States and France among others. All the advances by such countries are aggressive and retaliatory in nature. This even worsens the problem to Syria and accords Iran a greater chance of dominating the country and others in the region. A different approach is necessary to Syria in order to salvage the situation. Countries which have good faith especially in the gulf region have opted to launch friendly strategies in Syria (Paul, 2015). Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Qatar, in particular, believe that a friendly regime in Syria will give them influence over Iranian Friends-dominated Baghdad, over whom they have had little sway, but which is seen as a critical player in the regional balance of power (Afary,2015). Iraq’s post-2003 alliance with Iran is perceived as one of the key reasons for Tehran’s growing regional influence over the past decade. A new state in Syria could serve to strengthen currently marginalized Iraqi Sunni forces, giving them and their Gulf backers’ greater influence in Baghdad. At the same time, regime change in Damascus would help the Gulf States bolster their standing in Lebanon. This observation and analysis shows that Syria is a powerhouse of the region and strengthen it would mean a better stability for the entire region.

Conclusion

Regional dominance is essential to countries but this has limited benefits to the countries that are ruled. In this scenario, there is significance evidence that Iran is determined to achieve its selfish interests. The countries that are cooperating to curb the occurrence are right for the benefit of their region. Politics and various aspects or religion are just factors used to correct the situation. However, when used extremely then such strategies may culminate to adversities. Moderate opposition together with stabilizing countries closer to Syria would help in stabilizing the country and curtailing the intended Iranian dominance of the region.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
SKYSAVE